Which theoretical framework views living with chronic illness as an integral part of life?

The correct choice is the Chronic Illness Trajectory Model, which conceptualizes living with chronic illness as a continual and integral part of life rather than a discrete event that is solely focused on acute management. This model recognizes that chronic illness affects an individual’s lifestyle, emotional well-being, and social interactions over time, progressing through varying phases that include onset, stable periods, acute episodes, crisis, and eventual decline or death.

This framework emphasizes the dynamic and ongoing nature of chronic illness, acknowledging that patients often navigate through fluctuating health states and that this journey influences their quality of life. Rather than viewing chronic illness as just a series of medical challenges, this model appreciates the broader context of living with such conditions, encouraging a holistic approach to care that considers physical, emotional, and social dimensions.

In contrast, the other frameworks focus on different aspects: the Biopsychosocial model integrates biological, psychological, and social factors but does not specifically trace the course of chronic illness over time; the Health-Illness Continuum addresses the range of health status but lacks the focus on chronic conditions; and Systems Theory emphasizes interconnected systems but doesn't specifically pertain to the unique trajectory of chronic illness.